https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303404 --- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Replace this: ``` SourceLicense: MIT License: %{shrink: ((MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016) AND (Apache-2.0 OR BSL-1.0) AND (Apache-2.0 OR MIT) AND MIT } ``` With just this: ``` License: MIT ``` And you should be good. Setting the SourceLicense/License tag in the "main" package the way you did is wrong - it would cause the -devel subpackage have the "binary" license too, even if it should just be covered by the "Source" license. I don't know where you got the idea for using the "SourceLicense" tag? It's not used at all by rust2rpm for this type of package (for good reasons). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303404 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202303404%23c12 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
