https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307912 --- Comment #23 from Cristian Le <fedora@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Folks, I belive this package should be called python-pyliblo3 Oh, I guess the original `pyliblo` was packaged before `python-*` were a thing? I was basing it on the original package's naming convention, sorry about that. What about the `doc` subpackage in this case? `python3-pyliblo3-doc`? > Please use -l option for %pyproject_save_files instead. Isn't this build-backend dependent? I guess setuptools and hatchling support it at the moment? Hopefully this doesn't need to be ported to EPEL. > i changed this things in the spec-file, is this correct ? `Provides: python3-pyliblo` should be removed, see Adam's comment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2307912 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202307912%23c23 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
