https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296801 --- Comment #8 from Frank Dedden <frank@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- Nice. What do we do for this release? 1. Wait for the release on hackage, and (as an exception) base the package on the hackage version instead of the stackage release? 2. Manually adjust the license file or field. This way we would deviate from upstream. 3. Just package it as is: it won't be correct, but atleast we stay true to upstream. This will be fixed when the next version hits stackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2296801 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202296801%23c8 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
