Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-VCS-LibCVS - Access CVS working directories and repositories Alias: perl-VCS-LibCVS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253741 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2008-01-27 23:59 EST ------- rpmlint reports perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:21: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::ArgumentUsingRequests) perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:22: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Request::Requests) perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:23: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdateModifyingResponses) perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:24: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::FileUpdatingResponses) perl-VCS-LibCVS.src:25: W: unversioned-explicit-provides perl(VCS::LibCVS::Client::Response::Responses) Can we make above versioned? I don't think adding tests in %doc as blocker. I saw that this is already proposed in perl packaging draft also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review