https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304189 --- Comment #31 from Michael Catanzaro <mcatanza@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Hector Martin from comment #30) > Why can't we just patch firefox to add the openh264 lib to the sandbox? Well if the Requires strategy works, then there's no point. Maintaining the plugin as a separate source package is going to be work. Sure seems like there is no need for it. I will delete https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/mozilla-openh264 if the Requires works, as I expect. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304189 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202304189%23c31 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
