https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304189 --- Comment #27 from Martin Stransky <stransky@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michael Catanzaro from comment #26) > The only goal here is "Automatically install the OpenH264 codecs" > https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/84 > > Once mozilla-openh264 is installed, there is no problem. The problem is > figuring out how to make sure it gets installed automatically, without the > user having to install it manually. > > We have previously tried: > > Recommends: mozilla-openh264 > > but this did not work. So our next plan was to build mozilla-openh264 > against noopenh264, so we can install mozilla-openh264 by default instead of > relegating it to the separate Cisco repository. All of this is unnecessary > if we have some other way to install it. I think this should work > > Requires: mozilla-openh264 if openh264 > > We could probably have closed this bug 5.5 years ago had we considered > this.... Feel free to add it there by yourself, the package is open for provenpackagers. Please commit to rawhinde only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2304189 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202304189%23c27 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
