https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292554 --- Comment #27 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Yes, exactly. This is how it's handled for most other Rust bindings for C libraries - i.e. provide features that "unlock" APIs that are only added in newer versions of the C library than the "base" version that's supported. Mapping this to RPM metadata avoids very weird build issues when the version "expected" by the bindings is newer than the version of the library in the build environment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292554 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202292554%23c27 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue