[Bug 2303280] Review Request: gap-pkg-4ti2interface - GAP interface to 4ti2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303280

Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> ---
The only thing I don't like is that upstream bundled a few loosely coupled
projects into the same tarball. However anthough that's unfortunate it does not
relate to Fedora. So here is my formal

Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

===== MUST items =====

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license
(GPLv2+).
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception (see my notes
above).
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format (%autochangelog).
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package does not contain desktop file (not a GUI application).
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package does not contain systemd file(s).
[-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 2053 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: I did not test if the package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged
(https://github.com/homalg-project/homalg_project/releases?q=4ti2Interface&expanded=true)
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: No extra patches.
[-]: Sources were not verified with gpgverify (upstream doe not publish
signatures).
[?]: I did not test if the paackage compiles and builds into binary rpms on all
supported
     architectures. Noarch package anyway.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gap-pkg-4ti2interface-2023.02.04-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc-2023.02.04-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
          gap-pkg-4ti2interface-2023.02.04-1.fc41.src.rpm
==========================================================================================================================================
rpmlint session starts
==========================================================================================================================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp5t2g_1g5')]
checks: 32, packages: 3

gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/chooser.html
../../GAPDoc/styles/chooser.html
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/lefttoc.css
../../GAPDoc/styles/lefttoc.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/manual.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/manual.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.js
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/nocolorprompt.css
../../GAPDoc/styles/nocolorprompt.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/ragged.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/ragged.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/rainbow.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/rainbow.js
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/times.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/times.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/toggless.css
../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/toggless.js
../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.js
====================================================================================================
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings, 12 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 1.1 s
====================================================================================================


Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 2

gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/chooser.html
../../GAPDoc/styles/chooser.html
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/lefttoc.css
../../GAPDoc/styles/lefttoc.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/manual.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/manual.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/manual.js
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/nocolorprompt.css
../../GAPDoc/styles/nocolorprompt.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/ragged.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/ragged.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/rainbow.js ../../GAPDoc/styles/rainbow.js
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/times.css ../../GAPDoc/styles/times.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/toggless.css
../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.css
gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
/usr/share/gap/pkg/4ti2Interface/doc/toggless.js
../../GAPDoc/styles/toggless.js
 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings, 8 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 0.3 s 



Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/homalg-project/homalg_project//archive/4ti2Interface-2023.02-04.tar.gz
:
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
a35c17b93a08e7d3b9bb989d22d8c99d8563dd32c338e336f3d42b6f12604e85
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
a35c17b93a08e7d3b9bb989d22d8c99d8563dd32c338e336f3d42b6f12604e85


Requires
--------
gap-pkg-4ti2interface (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    4ti2
    gap-pkg-io

gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    gap-pkg-4ti2interface



Provides
--------
gap-pkg-4ti2interface:
    gap-pkg-4ti2interface

gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc:
    gap-pkg-4ti2interface-doc



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2303280
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api
Disabled plugins: R, C/C++, Perl, SugarActivity, Java, Python, Ocaml, fonts,
PHP, Haskell
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH


This package is

================
=== APPROVED ===
================


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2303280

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202303280%23c2

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux