https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302351 --- Comment #4 from Jan Drögehoff <sentrycraft123@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Peter Lemenkov from comment #3) > Few remarks. > > * Quick question - should these two libraries go to the main mpv package? > Looks very generic to me. > > ``` > %dir %{_libdir}/mpv/ > %dir %{_sysconfdir}/mpv/scripts > ``` > > Not a blocker - but please in the meantime discuss this thins with mpv > maintainer. This was initially done at request by leight scott https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5520#c1 and has also been adopted for the only other mpv plugin in the Fedora repos https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mpv_inhibit_gnome/blob/rawhide/f/mpv_inhibit_gnome.spec the reason its done like this is because plugins don't go into the libdir, they go into `/etc/mpv`, where the mpv systemwide-prefix is. I can talk with the mpv maintainers if `/etc/mpv` could be turned into a symlink to the lib folder, which would make this a lot nicer and allow shared objects to stay where they should be. > * Also it looks like your SPEC-file is different with the one from > SRPM-file. Please take a look at this. I linked the fail on the main branch and right after opening this the F41 rebuild happened. https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/mpv-mpris.git/plain/mpv-mpris.spec?id=9d4c3a091a5f4292a4efd69bba559995e36ec6ce has the spec prior to this > * More worse issue is lots of "undefined-non-weak-symbol" rpmlint messages. > Should the library be linked against mpv-libs? I couldn't get rpmlint to create this error on my end nor could I find it in the copr build. mpv-mpris does not link against libmpv directly since the library handles the plugin loading itself instead plugins are given a handle which they can use. > Apart from that I don't see any other issues so here is my formal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2302351 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202302351%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
