[Bug 1772578] Review Request: python-importlib-resources - Read resources from Python packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578



--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Cristian Le from comment #12)
> But what about any fixes/changes that are introduced in
> importlib_resources>=6.0 which correspond to Python3.13 [1], for example
> [2]. What I'm trying to say is that this package should not be treated any
> differently from `importlib_metadata` or `typing_extensions`.

I see. You explicitly mentioned Python<3.12.

I guess it's unavoidable to introduce it if upstreams depend on it :/

> Regarding Python<3.12, this is still needed for EPEL9.

Yeah, for EPEL, it makes perfect sense.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1772578

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201772578%23c13

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux