https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246704 --- Comment #10 from Michal Ambroz <rebus@xxxxxxxxx> --- Hello Miroslave, > And in the spec file there is nothing specifically requiring version 7. explicit versioning it is not in the spec file and it is not in the package. I do not understand this detection. Maybe it detects some deprecated API of pytest ... donno? Please how did you come to this detection? I do not see it in the review from the Fedora review service. >This is still not fixed. I believe this is not really issue. The file licenses.html is just part of the documentation package - rst rendered to html based on licenses.rst. File licenses.rst is itself just literally including the LICENSE file from package base directory. See https://github.com/DissectMalware/xlrd2/blob/master/docs/licenses.rst It is not wrong that it is not marked as %license and that it is not in the noarch package - source of the license information is the LICENSE file, which is already marked as %license. I believe the purpose of this rule is to have at least one meaningfull/authoritative copy of the license marked as %license, not to mark all rendered or otherwise derived copies. Frankly I would say that it is already wrong marking the documentation source file doc/licenses.rst as %license. Also it is wrong deleting of the /usr/share/doc/python-xlrd2-doc/html/_sources/licenses.rst.txt ... as the html rendered page is referring to that with a hyper-link to "Show source". Best regards Michal Ambroz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2246704 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202246704%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
