[Bug 2272134] Review Request: cosmic-panel - Panel for the COSMIC desktop environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272134

Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review?
                 CC|                            |ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx
           Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> ---
In my initial review, I did find a serious issue: the "GPL-3.0" license
identifier needs to be clarified.

It looks like the sources indicate the codebase is GPLv3, but there is a
complete lack of identifying marks about whether it's GPL-3.0-only or
GPL-3.0-or-later. The license default is "GPL-3.0-or-later", but I recommend
contacting upstream to make a decision on indicating this somehow. The GNU
licenses recommend some kind of license header on source files, and I would say
that's probably the right thing to do too.

I suspect this is necessary for all COSMIC projects.

Here's a suggested header template (from some projects I've seen):

/* This file is part of {project}.
 *
 * Copyright System76, Inc.
 *
 * Licensed under the GNU General Public License Version 3
 * Fedora-License-Identifier: GPLv3+
 * SPDX-2.0-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0+
 * SPDX-3.0-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
 *
 * {project} is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * {project} is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with {project}.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */

An simpler alternative that can work is something like this:

/*
 * This file is part of {project}
 * Copyright System76, Inc.
 *
 * Fedora-License-Identifier: GPLv3+
 * SPDX-2.0-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0+
 * SPDX-3.0-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0-or-later
 *
 * This program is free software.
 * For more information on the license, see LICENSE.md.
 * For more information on free software, see
<https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html>.
 */


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2272134

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202272134%23c5

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux