[Bug 2295820] Review Request: hipblaslt - ROCm general matrix operations beyond BLAS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820



--- Comment #14 from Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Tim Flink from comment #13)
> (In reply to Tom Rix from comment #11)
> > (In reply to Tim Flink from comment #6)
> > > (In reply to Jeremy Newton from comment #3)
> 
> <snip>
>  
> > I will replace bundled: with a strongly worded comment :P
> 
> eh, now that I'm re-reading this today and looking into it more, I just
> misunderstood what bundled(<libname>) does. For some reason, I thought it
> would show up as a regular provides and someone could install it instead of
> Tensile by accident. I withdraw my concern, it's not worth worrying about
> for now and we can deal with any Tensile replacement if/when it ever happens.

Then i will keep my strongly worded comment and add bundled: back.
> 
> (In reply to Tom Rix from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Tim Flink from comment #2)
> > > Overall, it looks good to me but there are 2 bigger things I'm concerned
> > > about:
> > > 1. Do the files in tensilite/Tensile/CustomKernels/ count as pre-generated
> > > code or content?
> > >    - Is it possible to delete the CustomKernels directory and still build
> > > for gfx941 and gfx942 albeit with a less optimized setup? If so, I'd lean
> > > more towards content
> > 
> > No it does not build when the kernels are removed.
> 
> Did we ever find an answer to what we can do about these kinds of binary
> files and whether they're package-able? I remember it coming up with miopen
> but I don't remember what the conclusion was. The review went through, so I
> assume that it was determined to be kosher-enough?

You asked for them to be removed, I removed them. this crippled miopen
optimizations. Now it is on Fedora to regenerate the results which needs
hardware to do that. Fedora does not have this hw.  Eventually someone will
notice and ask for it to be put back.

So I would rather not do the same other places.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295820

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202295820%23c14

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux