https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299173 --- Comment #18 from Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #14) > (In reply to Sandro Bonazzola from comment #8) > > Looking at above fedora review you pasted, I'm a bit worried about: > > > > Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > > Note: No known owner of /usr/share, /usr/share/cargo/registry, > > /usr/share/cargo, /usr/share/licenses, /usr > > > > I'm checking this one, I'll push an update. > > This is a false positive from fedora-review. The directories *are* owned. > Please don't own them again. I know, it's just the generated rpm is not requiring the packages that on those directories. > If you think something generated by rust2rpm is wrong, please don't just > monkey-patch it, but report a bug against rust2rpm. Done: https://pagure.io/fedora-rust/rust2rpm/issue/282 > Side note: > Pasting the fedora-review template isn't really helpful if the items with > empty [ ] checkboxes aren't checked manually and filled [x] or [!]. Yes. @Dorinda can you please complete manual checks in next review round? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299173 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202299173%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
