https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299712 Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #4 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > > > export RUSTFLAGS='%{build_rustflags}' > > > > This should be part of %set_build_flags, is it actually needed? > Hmm, it doesn’t look like it. Perhaps I copied that thoughtlessly from something else, or perhaps I did it in anticipation of possibly backporting to EPEL9 where %set_build_flags is not automatic – but I can cross that bridge when and if I get there. RUSTFLAGS are only part of %set_build_flags on newer Fedora branches. I don't quite remember if it's F40+ or F39+ ... so it's necessary for older branches (and just redundant on newer branches). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2299712 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202299712%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
