https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283541 --- Comment #3 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Much of the CC0-1.0 software I know of applies the license by conflating CC0-1.0 with the public domain, something roughly like this: This software is in the public domain. Specifically, you can use it under CC0-1.0. So I’m interested to see what Fedora Legal thinks here. Per https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/#_public_domain, uses of LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain require review and recording the text in https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/blob/main/public-domain-text.txt anyway, so the effort won’t be wasted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283541 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283541%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
