Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ggz-gtk-client - Gtk+ client libraries for GGZ gaming zone https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430360 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-26 18:03 EST ------- Seems like this has the same problem as the last ggz package I looked at: ggz-gtk-client.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/ggz-gtk ['/usr/lib64'] In addition, there are these: ggz-gtk-client.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libggz-gtk.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libatk-1.0.so.0 ggz-gtk-client.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libggz-gtk.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 ggz-gtk-client.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libggz-gtk.so.1.0.0 /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2 ggz-gtk-client.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libggz-gtk.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 ggz-gtk-client.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libggz-gtk.so.1.0.0 /lib64/libdl.so.2 These probably come from either an overzealous configure script or .pc files; I don't think they particularly hurt anything. The rpath thing, though, will need a tweak. I guess we're recommending using chrpath these days, but also check the ggz-client-libs specfile to see what Rex did. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review