[Bug 2297994] Review Request: rust-libpanel-sys - FFI bindings for GNOME libpanel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297994

Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Considering

# Generated by rust2rpm 26
#---- cross_validate_constants_with_c stdout ----
#Constant value mismatch for PANEL_MINOR_VERSION
#Rust: "3"
#C:    "6"
#Constant value mismatch for PANEL_VERSION_S
#Rust: "1.3.0"
#C:    "1.6.0"
#thread 'cross_validate_constants_with_c' panicked at tests/abi.rs:112:13:
#FAILED: 11 passed; 2 failed

I think that skipping all of the tests is not the right way to handle this.

It seems like these constants (PANEL_MAJOR_VERSION, PANEL_MINOR_VERSION,
PANEL_MICRO_VERSION, and PANEL_VERSION_S,
https://gitlab.gnome.org/World/Rust/libpanel-rs/-/blob/main/sys/src/lib.rs?ref_type=heads#L42)
are designed to expose the version of the C libpanel library. On the other
hand, they are also part of a file that is generated from GIR, so maybe it
doesn’t make sense to patch these (because they correctly reflect that the Rust
bindings were generated against an older libpanel version). If we decide it’s
OK for these constants to disagree with the packaged libpanel version, then it
would at least be better to skip *only* the tests that fail because of the
mismatch, similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292542#c9.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2297994

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202297994%23c2

-- 
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux