Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: quota https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226353 limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ASSIGNED ------- Additional Comments From limb@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-25 15:24 EST ------- I get the impression that if quota-devel is made a virtual package, the real package will never happen. Of course, the real quota-devel would require the main package anyway, so anyone installing -devel wouldn't notice. How would we move this header to the glibc package? Unless I misunderstand, that sounds unnecessarily awkward. I'm more in favor of the virtual package route. I'd be ok with the virtual package, but my preference is still the -devel subpackage. I guess I'm having a hard time understanding your objection to that. Sure, it's an extra package, but it's the same SRPM, and no real extra maintenance. It would reduce bloat for end users, and have negligible effect on developers. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review