https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283850 --- Comment #18 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- > Oh, these did not get picked up a build time? No, v2_local seems to be an off-by-default feature. > Probably those would be seen in the Fedora review service. They should have been. But the service seems to sometimes have trouble with installability checks ... > I only need `v3` and `v4`, so how would you recommend to patch this, is `features.hide` enough, or should also delete that dependency/feature? I think in this case a setting like this should do it: ``` [features] hide = ["v2_local", "chacha20poly1305"] ``` -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283850 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283850%23c18 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
