[Bug 429323] Review Request: emacs-lua - Lua major mode for GNU Emacs and XEmacs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: emacs-lua - Lua major mode for GNU Emacs and XEmacs


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429323


tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx  2008-01-24 19:32 EST -------
I grabbed the src.rpm from koji.  It does build OK; rpmlint says:
  emacs-lua.noarch: W: no-documentation
  emacs-lua-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
  xemacs-lua.noarch: W: no-documentation
  xemacs-lua-el.noarch: W: no-documentation
which are OK; there's just a single .el file in this package which gets
byte-compiled.  Actually this package is pretty much trivial.

One thing you might want to do is use "cp -p" in %build to preserve the
timestamps on the el file.

It looks like the *emacs-lua-el packages do not require the *emacs-lua packages.
   This is a blocker.

* source files match upstream:
   93df13a1916c0cade5b76721f26ffdd20fd248f37706ac1effbbdc80e04342fc  
   lua-mode-20071122.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summaries are OK.
* descriptions are OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
X final provides and requires:
  emacs-lua-20071122-3.fc9.noarch.rpm
   emacs-lua = 20071122-3.fc9
  =
   emacs(bin) >= emacs_version

  emacs-lua-el-20071122-3.fc9.noarch.rpm
   emacs-lua-el = 20071122-3.fc9
  =
X  (should require emacs-lua)

  xemacs-lua-20071122-3.fc9.noarch.rpm
   xemacs-lua = 20071122-3.fc9
  =
   xemacs >= 21.5.28

  xemacs-lua-el-20071122-3.fc9.noarch.rpm
   xemacs-lua-el = 20071122-3.fc9
  =
X  (should require xemacs-lua)

* %check is not present; I did not test this package.
* owns the directories it creates (ignoring dependency errors above)
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* no documentation at all to package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]