https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292522 wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxx | |m Flags| |fedora-review? CC| |lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxx | |m Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> --- 1) Shouldn't the following subpackage: %package -n %{name}+x86-devel Summary: %{summary} BuildArch: noarch be somehow restricted to x86_64, and not be noarch? At https://github.com/etemesi254/zune-image/blob/dev/crates/zune-jpeg/README.md#crate-features it says that this "Enables x86 specific instructions" 2) x86 requires x86_64-v2, x86_64-v3. Wouldn't that be an issue for x86_64-v1 when used in an application using this as a dependency? [fedora-review-service-build] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292522 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202292522%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
