https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274394 --- Comment #4 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Out of curiosity, why ship an empty OpenCTM meta package instead of making that package ship the desktop application, which has been split off into OpenCTM-viewer? Since OpenCTM contains no files, shouldn't it be `noarch`? Not sure if that's possible, but it would get rid of `OpenCTM.x86_64: E: no-binary`, though not a goal by itself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274394 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202274394%23c4 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
