https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279676 --- Comment #3 from Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer@xxxxxxxxx> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Non-issue: rpmlint errors: "erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol" for symbols that appear to be part of the erlang runtime. That seems like a false positive. - No issues found ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache License 2.0", "FSF Unlimited License [generated file]", "Apache License 2.0". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gordon/git/fedora/erlang-cache_tab/review-erlang- cache_tab/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 5679 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see attached diff). See: (this test has no URL) (Diffs are auto-tag related.) [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm erlang-cache_tab-debuginfo-1.0.30-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm erlang-cache_tab-debugsource-1.0.30-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-1.fc41.src.rpm ======================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================== rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpv2k59cel')] checks: 32, packages: 4 erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: beam-was-not-recompiled /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/ebin/cache_tab.beam /builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-build/cache_tab-1.0.30/src/cache_tab.erl erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: beam-was-not-recompiled /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/ebin/cache_tab_app.beam /builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-build/cache_tab-1.0.30/src/cache_tab_app.erl erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: beam-was-not-recompiled /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/ebin/cache_tab_sup.beam /builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-build/cache_tab-1.0.30/src/cache_tab_sup.erl erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: beam-was-not-recompiled /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/ebin/ets_cache.beam /builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-build/cache_tab-1.0.30/src/ets_cache.erl erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: beam-was-not-recompiled /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/ebin/ets_cache_options.beam /builddir/build/BUILD/erlang-cache_tab-1.0.30-build/cache_tab-1.0.30/src/ets_cache_options.erl == 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings, 23 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s === Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: erlang-cache_tab-debuginfo-1.0.30-1.fc41.x86_64.rpm ======================================== rpmlint session starts ======================================== rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpr_655c4e')] checks: 32, packages: 1 === 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s === Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.5.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 3 erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_free (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_priv_data (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_make_ulong (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_make_atom (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_alloc (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_mutex_lock (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_make_uint (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_mutex_destroy (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_make_tuple (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_get_uint (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_make_badarg (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_mutex_unlock (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: E: undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so enif_mutex_create (/usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so) erlang-cache_tab.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 13 errors, 1 warnings, 20 filtered, 13 badness; has taken 0.3 s Unversioned so-files -------------------- erlang-cache_tab: /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/cache_tab-1.0.30/priv/lib/ets_cache.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/processone/cache_tab/archive/1.0.30/cache_tab-1.0.30.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : c506d2aa2e59f1e0086ce32234618189d557a767312179cc1c8df19754131ca2 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : c506d2aa2e59f1e0086ce32234618189d557a767312179cc1c8df19754131ca2 Requires -------- erlang-cache_tab (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): erlang(erl_nif_version) erlang-erts(x86-64) erlang-kernel(x86-64) erlang-p1_utils erlang-stdlib(x86-64) libc.so.6()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) erlang-cache_tab-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): erlang-cache_tab-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): Provides -------- erlang-cache_tab: erlang-cache_tab erlang-cache_tab(x86-64) erlang-cache_tab-debuginfo: debuginfo(build-id) erlang-cache_tab-debuginfo erlang-cache_tab-debuginfo(x86-64) erlang-cache_tab-debugsource: erlang-cache_tab-debugsource erlang-cache_tab-debugsource(x86-64) Diff spec file in url and in SRPM --------------------------------- --- /home/gordon/git/fedora/erlang-cache_tab/erlang-cache_tab.spec 2024-05-07 15:00:24.000000000 -0700 +++ /home/gordon/git/fedora/erlang-cache_tab/review-erlang-cache_tab/srpm-unpacked/erlang-cache_tab.spec 2024-05-06 17:00:00.000000000 -0700 @@ -1,2 +1,12 @@ +## START: Set by rpmautospec +## (rpmautospec version 0.6.3) +## RPMAUTOSPEC: autorelease, autochangelog +%define autorelease(e:s:pb:n) %{?-p:0.}%{lua: + release_number = 1; + base_release_number = tonumber(rpm.expand("%{?-b*}%{!?-b:1}")); + print(release_number + base_release_number - 1); +}%{?-e:.%{-e*}}%{?-s:.%{-s*}}%{!?-n:%{?dist}} +## END: Set by rpmautospec + %global srcname cache_tab %global p1_utils_ver 1.0.25 @@ -50,3 +60,152 @@ %changelog -%autochangelog +## START: Generated by rpmautospec +* Tue May 07 2024 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.30-1 +- Uncommitted changes + +* Tue May 07 2024 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-7 +- Revert "Orphaned for 6+ weeks" + +* Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-6 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild + +* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-5 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild + +* Thu Jan 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-4 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild + +* Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-3 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild + +* Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sat Aug 01 2020 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.25-1 +- Update to 1.0.25 (#1807250) + +* Sat Aug 01 2020 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.21-4 +- Second attempt - Rebuilt for + https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild + +* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.21-3 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild + +* Mon Feb 17 2020 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.21-2 +- Remove 2018 changelog entries + +* Mon Feb 17 2020 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.21-1 +- Update to 1.0.21 (#1789138) + +* Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.20-4 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild + +* Tue Nov 26 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.20-3 +- Bring cache_tab back to s390x (#1772962) + +* Fri Nov 15 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.20-2 +- Add an ExcludeArch on s390x. + +* Thu Nov 14 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.20-1 +- Update to 1.0.20 (#1742463) + +* Wed Jul 24 2019 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.19-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild + +* Wed Jun 05 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.19-1 +- Update to 1.0.19 (#1713296) + +* Tue Apr 16 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.18-1 +- Update to 1.0.18 (#1683120). + +* Sun Feb 24 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.17-4 +- Trim changelog prior to 2018. + +* Thu Feb 21 2019 Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@xxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.17-3 +- Rebuild for Erlang 21 + +* Thu Jan 31 2019 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.17-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sat Jan 12 2019 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.17-1 +- Update to 1.0.17. + +* Sun Oct 14 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.16-1 +- Update to 1.0.16. + +* Tue Jul 31 2018 Florian Weimer <fweimer@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.14-2 +- Rebuild with fixed binutils + +* Mon Jul 30 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.14-1 +- Update to 1.0.14 (#1596195). + +* Thu Jul 12 2018 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.13-4 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild + +* Thu Mar 29 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.13-3 +- Remove explicit requires on nif. + +* Thu Mar 29 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.13-2 +- Add a debug package. + +* Thu Mar 29 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.13-1 +- Update to 1.0.13 (#1560116). + +* Sun Mar 25 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.12-5 +- Re-rebuild against Erlang 20. + +* Thu Feb 22 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.12-4 +- Rebuilt for Erlang 20. + +* Sun Feb 18 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.12-3 +- BR on gcc and add .rpmlint file. + +* Wed Feb 07 2018 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.12-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sun Jan 14 2018 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.12-1 +- Update to 1.0.12 (#1515216). + +* Sat Nov 11 2017 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.11-1 +- Update to 1.0.11 (#1434803). + +* Sun Oct 22 2017 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.9-3 +- Install the shared objects and depend on erlang_nif (#1505170). + +* Wed Aug 02 2017 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.9-2 +- Rebuilt for + https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sun Jul 30 2017 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.9-1 +- Update to 1.0.9 (#1434803). + +* Wed Jul 26 2017 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.6-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sun Feb 12 2017 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.6-1 +- Update to 1.0.6 (#1398605). + +* Fri Feb 10 2017 Fedora Release Engineering <releng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.5-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sat Dec 31 2016 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.5-1 +- Update to 1.0.5 (#1398605). + +* Fri Jul 01 2016 Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.4-1 +- Update to 1.0.4 (#1351601) + +* Mon Mar 14 2016 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.2-1 +- Update to 1.0.2 (#1304906). + +* Fri Mar 11 2016 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.1-2 +- Rebuild to use the new automatic provides/requires behavior. + +* Tue Feb 16 2016 Randy Barlow <randy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.1-1 +- Update to version 1.0.1. + +* Wed Feb 03 2016 Dennis Gilmore <dennis@xxxxxxxx> - 1.0.0-2 +- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild + +* Sat Jan 09 2016 Jeremy Cline <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxx> - 1.0.0-1 +- Initial import (#1295075) +## END: Generated by rpmautospec Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -n erlang-cache_tab Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Shell-api, C/C++, Generic Disabled plugins: PHP, SugarActivity, Haskell, Python, R, fonts, Perl, Java, Ocaml Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279676 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202279676%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
