https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686307 Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #25 from Sandro <gui1ty@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #24) > Hmm, okay, so it seems like it was Ben Beasley's idea, and the idea was to > force dask to build on all arches so the tests would run on all arches and > catch any problems, but the installable subpackages would all be noarch. > However, it never worked out this way, because he didn't think about the > %pyproject_extras_subpkg subpackages. I think the general idea with that approach was/is that it builds on all arches indeed. Because with `BuildArch: noarch` you don't know which builder will be chosen and it is annoying seeing you scratch build succeed and the real build fail because it is on a different arch. But I let Ben speak for himself (cc'ed). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686307 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%201686307%23c25 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
