https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293272 --- Comment #6 from Siddhesh Poyarekar <sipoyare@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #4) > The "compat-*" naming scheme has been obsolete for years. No new packages > should use it. > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple > > In this case, the package name should probably be "gcc13". We want to package a gcc that runs behind the bleeding edge a bit, so gcc13 where the default compiler is gcc14, gcc14, when the default compiler rebases to gcc15, and so on. For that reason, we want to avoid having the version number in the name and call it something descriptive without a version number. It looks like the naming convention allows the latter[1], so maybe gcc-prevrel? [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2293272 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202293272%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
