https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 --- Comment #25 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- I agree alternatives seems the correct way to choose, since those tools seems to have compatible common interface. But because we arrive after Go project, even though it seems it is newer, I made xqp alternative name for xq tool. They are not candidates for alternatives, since they do not share common parsing options. I made yqp provided by python3-yq package and conflicting yq name provided by python3-yq-alt, which still uses alternatives. But until also golang project uses alternatives, it conflicts with yq. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202263790%23c25 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
