https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Michel Lind <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(michel@michel-slm | |.name) | --- Comment #23 from Michel Lind <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Martin Hoyer from comment #22) > Petr, > I've coincidentally had a chance to briefly discuss yq with Michel, who did > the #2276522. > With Neal, they've mentioned having the two packages conflicting each other, > instead the use of alternatives. > > Michel, would you help here in order to have the same logic in both packages > please? yup, of course. Have we aligned on what virtual provide to use? What came up, IIRC is - use a virtual provide, so we can do this (name is up for discussion) Provides: yq-bin Conflicts: yq-bin I also wonder if we can just say 'Conflicts: /usr/bin/yq' and if that could be enough. - the Python module does not need to conflict, only the Python binary, so the binaries should be shipped in a separate subpackage (so you can have the Python module installed on the same system as the Go binary, if needed) Happy to adjust the Go package once we get this sorted. Example of this being used by the different Django packages: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django4.2/blob/rawhide/f/python-django4.2.spec (you need to suppress rpmlint because it will be unhappy about the unversioned provides: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-django4.2/blob/rawhide/f/python-django4.2.rpmlintrc) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202263790%23c23 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
