Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mogilefs-server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252257 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-24 11:36 EST ------- I continue to disagree. An application that happens to include Perl modules does not need to be named perl-* any more than an application written in any other language would. If there were reason to split the modules from the application then of course the package with the modules would of course have the usual naming convention for Perl modules. It may be that that's the case. See also Spamassassin, in the distro for some time now. It's clearly an application, having an initscript, config files and executables, but it happens to include a whole bunch of Perl modules. (And it's not the only one; Perlbal is another.) Frankly I'd expect that any well-written Perl application would include some modules. But now I fully expect Ralf to launch into another tirade to try to get Spamassassin and Perlbal renamed as well. Such is life. Ruben, in the end, I don't really care, and I won't comment further on this ticket. I personally just tune Ralf out when he goes on like this, but if you decide that you want to rename this package then be my guest. Just make another CVS request and we'll figure out how to get rid of the existing package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review