https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074467 Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #10 from Petr Menšík <pemensik@xxxxxxxxxx> --- There would be conflict if both this review and bug #2263790 pass, because both provide tool named %_bindir/yq. Any idea how that should be solved? I thought about naming those tools by pyq, meaning python yq. Possible alternative would be gyq, golang yq (this package). Still not long enough, but different from upstream. Of course alternative is also yq.python and yq.go and customizable alternative via Alternatives [1]. But I doubt those implementations are similar enough. But target functionality is basically the same. It seems Debian has chosen bug #2263790, but has alternative name xq-python for xq tool. I have not found any clear attempt to resolve the conflict on upstream side. Issue #141 [2] references the problem on python upstream, but haven't found similar note at mikefarah. Except for pip version issue #193 [3]. Would you consider using alternatives to share yq name? Would you have any other idea, how to solve it? 1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Alternatives/ 2. https://github.com/kislyuk/yq/issues/141 3. https://github.com/mikefarah/yq/issues/193 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2074467 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202074467%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
