https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Cristian Le <fedora@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |needinfo?(pemensik@redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #11 from Cristian Le <fedora@xxxxxxxxx> --- > So having jq in BuildRequires is good, but are you sure about `Requires: jq`? Checked the source a bit and it uses `subprocess` to call `jq`. > %global _description I like the version you've posted better. Is it ok even if it's not in an upstream source? Didn't check the accuracy of the description. Petr, would you want to continue with this review? I don't want to open another review request before checking in with you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2263790 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202263790%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
