Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-23 19:53 EST ------- Have you checked your defines to make sure they don't clash with other packages. The example given was in your etl_profile_.h.in ETL-config This is a blocker, because it prevent you from installing 386 and the x86_64 packages in parallel. quoting from ralf btw: Your remark had caused me to have a closer look into the headers. They are scattered with autoheader defines which all will trigger the same issue as outlined above. In reference to the clash's if you change your defines they should be fine. The etl-config issue as well. One other question why does it need a static library since we remove it after building? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review