https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282767 --- Comment #15 from Jonathan Wright <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Yes...ish. I didn't do it for a few reasons. vaultwarden-web is a patched version of bitwarden's web client (all licensing is solid on it) but it yields to some custom and wacky build scripts to build the web sources. The dep tree is also about 1.5G worth of node_modules. Further, nodejs-packaging-bundler cannot build the tarball for it because of some wacky things that bitwarden does in package.json that would have to be patched on every release, then using their custom build scripts to generate the node_modules to grab. I'm not even sure if feeding that node_modules into the build would be enough or if there's more weird stuff RPM would run into trying to build. I intend to keep researching this path but right now it's an unncessary blocker for building the main vaultwarden API server/package. While this is not ideal, it's the only solution I see right now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282767 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202282767%23c15 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
