https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282872 --- Comment #11 from Attila Kovacs <attipaci@xxxxxxxxx> --- Spec URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/attipaci/supernovas/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07481595-supernovas-libs/supernovas-libs.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/attipaci/supernovas/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/07481595-supernovas-libs/supernovas-libs-1.0.1-1.fc41.src.rpm - Partial reversion of the last change. Back to full version in .so file name (e.g. 'libsupernovas.so.1.0.1'), and major-only SONAME (e.g. 'libsupernovas.so.1'). If my understanding of the packaging guide is correct, this is best practice for libs. But do let me know if a different scheme is recommended for versioning these. -- Attila -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282872 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202282872%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
