https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277254 --- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> --- Oh, sorry, forgot to respond to the question about ocaml-lwt. I'm ambivalent about Provides: bundled(ocaml-lwt), since the code in question apparently predates ocaml-lwt as a separate entity. It's probably find to omit that Provides, as it wouldn't serve the purpose of such bundled Provides. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277254 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277254%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
