[Bug 2251785] Review Request: openvino - Open Visual Inference And Optimization toolkit for AI inference

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251785



--- Comment #12 from Tom Rix <trix@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
License:        Apache-2.0

[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.         
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses          
     found: "Unknown or generated", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright*       
     Apache License 2.0", "BSD 3-Clause License", "MIT License", "Apache        
     License 2.0 and/or Intel Open Source License", "MIT License and/or         
     zlib License", "Apache License", "*No copyright* MIT License", "*No        
     copyright* Apache License 2.0 and/or MIT License", "GNU General Public     
     License, Version 2", "BSD 3-Clause License and/or GNU General Public       
     License, Version 2", "Apache License 2.0 and/or MIT License", "Apache      
     License 2.0 and/or Boost Software License 1.0", "Apache License 2.0        
     and/or BSD 3-Clause License", "Apache License 2.0 [generated file]",       
     "Apache License 2.0 and/or Historical Permission Notice and                
     Disclaimer". 5539 files have unknown license. Detailed output of           
     licensecheck in /home/trix/reviews/review-openvino/licensecheck.txt  

Your license: file is not complete.
Since you have bundled components, go into detail which of these licenses are
for the main package and which are for the others.

[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.                   
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages,               
     /usr/lib64/python3.12, /usr/lib64/pkgconfig,                               
     /usr/lib64/openvino-2024.0.0, /usr/lib64/cmake

Need to add %dir's here ex/
%dir %_libdir/openvino-2024.0.0

ExclusiveArch:  x86_64 
%ifarch x86_64                                                                  
BuildRequires:  xbyak-devel                                                     
%endif 

This ifarch check is not needed.

Provides:       bundled(onednn) 

should have a bundled(onednn) == version
similar for mlas

Requires:       lib%{name}-ir-frontend = %{version}                             
Requires:       lib%{name}-pytorch-frontend = %{version}                        
Recommends:     %{name}-auto-plugin = %{version}                                
Recommends:     %{name}-auto-batch-plugin = %{version}                          
Recommends:     %{name}-hetero-plugin = %{version}                              
Recommends:     %{name}-intel-cpu-plugin = %{version}

This is an overly complicated use of subpackages, most (all?) have a single
*.so
Reduce the subpackages to just the main, python and devel or make a strong case
for each.

        -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="%{optflags} -Wformat -Wformat-security" \

Should be redundant, why is this needed ?

-python package seems to missing its distinfo/egg dir.

The should be a %check or some option -test subpackage.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251785

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202251785%23c12
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux