https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277389 --- Comment #11 from Ben Beasley <code@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #7) > The project looks pretty dead :( > > Thank you for filing the issue / PR upstream, but I'm not hopeful that it > will do anything. > > If uv / async_http_range_reader really needs this crate, it might be a good > idea to fork it. > > The upstream repo also has an open issue about a correctness bug (integer > overflow in mid-point calculation) which would be good to fix. Does this attempt at replacing the crate with standard-library functionality look correct to you? https://github.com/musicinmybrain/async_http_range_reader/commit/dde1525a6fab737f74ba426a0ab4f4c1b30988af The tests in async_http_range_reader pass with that change, but I don’t have too much confidence in its test coverage, and I would appreciate a second person looking at the documentation. https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/vec/struct.Vec.html#method.partition_point https://docs.rs/bisection/latest/bisection/fn.bisect_left.html https://docs.rs/bisection/latest/bisection/fn.bisect_right.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277389 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277389%23c11 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
