[Bug 2276294] Review Request: tinygltf - Header only C++11 tiny glTF 2.0 library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276294



--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "Boost Software License
     1.0 and/or MIT License", "BSD 3-Clause License". 54 files have unknown
     license. Detailed output of licensecheck in

BSD-3-Clause for cpplint

The other licenses seem to fall to the tests and you've patched inline to use
system libs.

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/cmake
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/cmake

cmake-filesystem

[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.

What about deps/cpplint.py?

[!]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.

What about tools/windows/premake5.exe?

[xdg]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
     tinygltf-devel , tinygltf-examples

Auto-complete fail, this is good.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2276294

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202276294%23c3
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux