[Bug 2277528] Review Request: libsurvive - Open Source Lighthouse Tracking System

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277528



--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Steffan <jonathansteffan@xxxxxxxxx> ---
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "MIT License", "GNU General Public
     License, Version 3", "zlib License", "Apache License 1.1", "MIT
     License and/or The Unlicense", "BSD 2-Clause License". 528 files have
     unknown license.
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.

Looks like there is some stuff in redist that needs to be addressed.

[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/udev/rules.d, /usr/lib/udev,
     /usr/lib64/pkgconfig

systemd-udev
pkgconf-pkg-config

[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.

I want to note there is bundled statically linked libraries and I don't know if
it passes https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling
(I suspect it does and I think we should continue with this strategy for all of
the XR stuff.)

[!]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.

With the 32bit tests not being reliable, should we exclude?

[!]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
     justified.

I've noticed a pattern of adding "downstream-only: why it's downstream only and
what it does" as a good comment for patches that we don't intend on sending
upstream.

[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

See comment about 32bit.

Based on my understanding of the policy, the following is acceptable because
the so-files are outside of the default LD path.

Unversioned so-files
--------------------
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/disambiguator_statebased.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_dummy.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_global_scene_solver.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_playback.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_simulator.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_udp.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_usbmon.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/driver_vive.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_barycentric_svd.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_dummy.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_kalman_only.so
libsurvive: /usr/lib64/libsurvive/plugins/poser_mpfit.so


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277528

Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277528%23c3
--
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux