Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mogilefs-server - Server part of the MogileFS distributed filesystem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252257 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-21 21:21 EST ------- (In reply to comment #12) > My guess is that the guidelines were written with perl modules in mind. The guidelines were written with CPAN distributions (distribution != module) in mind. > mogilefs-server contains 2 standalone daemons, and isn't meant to be included in other perl programs. This doesn't matter. What matters is the package installing its modules into the perl-vendor-tree, is it being distributed via CPAN (it is update-able via cpan), and is ease of maintainer's (using cpancheck) and user's life (Making this package's relation to CPAN obvious). Also, we've had precedences where package had been forced to be renamed to using the perl-<distribution> convention. I don't see why this package should be an exception. > So in this case, mogilefs-server is probably more clear, but both names > have its pro's and con's. There would be nothing wrong in letting this package "Provide: mogilefs-server". It's all about ease of life, but ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review