https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049400 --- Comment #13 from Nikola Forró <nforro@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dominik Wombacher from comment #12) > Based on https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling > I understand we CAN do it but it wouldn't be reasonable. > Separate aws-c-* packages mean we can re-use them for python-awscrt and all > others right? Sounds like a much better approach then. As far as aws-crt-python is concerned, upstream doesn't want to depend on specific versions of dynamic libraries and rather pulls in specific revisions of the libraries and links them statically. > Now I'm not sure anymore, it looks like some of them have open review > request but stuck because of python-awscrt already ships them? Technically it doesn't ship the libraries, it ships _awscrt.abiN.so the libraries are statically linked into. I think it is possible for python-awscrt to bundle the libraries and at the same time have them packaged separately, is it not? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2049400 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202049400%23c13 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
