Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: upstart - an event-driven init daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429028 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-01-21 14:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #5) > > It will be much better for testers and reviewers to be able to > > install both packages in parallel. initng can be installed in > > parallel, for example. > > > > Initng is packaged as something for more advanced users to experiment with. Its > packaging style is not well suited to being the default out of the box init > system This seems to be untrue to me. Having initng as the default out the box init system only requires changing grub command line. Anyway it isn't the subject of this submission. Using alternatives seems right to me since it would allow to keep the old init system around after upstart has become the default system. (In reply to comment #13) > Well, except I doubt we'd ever ship the system init daemon in a final release as > something alternatives-able. So, it's a lot of initial work for little long-term > gain. Why not? This would allow users to chose the old init system if they happen to need it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review