https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 --- Comment #6 from wojnilowicz <lukasz.wojnilowicz@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #5) > Is there a reason why you opted out of rpmautospec for this package? > > It is the default for Rust packages for years, and the preferred option for > all new Fedora package since Fedora 38. > see also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Rpmautospec_by_Default > > rpmautospec is especially useful for Rust packages, since the way they work > currently requires re-generating the spec file with rust2rpm for every new > upstream version - with rpmautospec this is easy, without it, it requires > restoring the changelog manually. > > Other than that, the package looks good to me. No reason. I've just updated the spec file to use rpmautospec. Could you approve the package then? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271100 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202271100%23c6 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
