[Bug 429450] Review Request: gstream - Simplified stream output/input for Allegro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: gstream - Simplified stream output/input for Allegro


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429450





------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx  2008-01-21 05:37 EST -------
(In reply to comment #1)

Thanks for taking a look at this!

> I've got two issues here
> a) mock build fails with:
> 
> Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26053
> + umask 022
> + cd /builddir/build/BUILD
> + cd gstream16
> + LANG=C
> + export LANG
> + unset DISPLAY
> + make -j3 -f Makefile.unx MAKEDOC=/usr/bin/allegro-makedoc 'OFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe
> -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexception
> s -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -fPIC'
> Missing the makedoc utility from Allegro! Please copy the makedoc executable
> from allegro/docs to this directory.
> + rm test.o
> rm: cannot remove `test.o': No such file or directory
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.26053 (%build)
> 
> This happens despite having allegro-devel installed.
> 

Erm, oops, my bad, allegro-devel was "missing" makedoc (not install by make
install, but appearantly needed by some apps). Since I'm also the allegro
maintainer I fixed this, but I never committed let alone build my changes (other
then a local build).

I'm currently working on fixing allegro <-> pulseaudio interaction, when I'm
done with that I'll push a new allegro to devel, F-8 and F-7 which does include
makedoc (which I've name allegro-makedoc as makedoc is a bit generic).

I'll add a note here once the new allegro is done.

> b) I've noticed that you pass some custom flags to gcc when building
> libgstrm.so.0. Due to the failed build, I did not reach this point so I could
> not see what flags are actually used, so I figured I'd better ask, just in case:
> shouldn't RPM_OPT_FLAGS be used here, too ? 

Yes, you're right I'll fix this after a full review is done, as I would like to
keep the number of iterations (== work for both of us) to a minimum.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]