Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: documentation-devil - Documentation tool chain https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427481 ------- Additional Comments From petersen@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-21 00:56 EST ------- As an experiment I tried the following: $ rpm -q docbook-style-xsl docbook-style-xsl-1.73.2-4.fc8.noarch $ rm -rf documentation-devil-0.26 $ tar zxf documentation-devil-0.26.tgz $ cd documentation-devil-0.26 $ rm -r xsl/docbook $ sed -i -e "s%http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.72.0%http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/1.73.2%"; xsl/*.xsl $ make docs and it seems to build ok. So unless there are any known issues with docbook-xsl-1.73.2 I think it would be safe not to include "xsl/docbook/". It would also reduce the installed size from 34MB to 14MB and reduce the binary package from 7MB to 3MB. Would it be possible upstream to change the license to be explicitly GPL2? It would be good if there were explicit license headers in the source files. In fop/ are both font-metrics/ and font-metrics-0.93/ needed? In a way it would be nice if the font metric data could be generated at build time but maybe that could be done later. It might be better to move the desktop file to a separate file at some point specially if it is going to be translated, or just to include it in the source? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review