https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271204 --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- I read that part of the guidelines when I was figuring out what the name of the package should be. The guideline text is: > Rust crates that are published on crates.io MUST be packaged with rust-$crate as the name of the source package (where $crate is the name of the project on crates.io). > [...] > On the other hand, projects from other sources MUST NOT use the rust- prefix for source package names So this *is* a project from crates.io. The name is registered on crates.io and you can download a version of this project from there, even if it not exactly the version which is present in the package. In fact, I pushed version 0.1.0 to crates.io specifically to satisfy the guidelines and make rust2rpm generate the binary package as expected. There is a certain ambiguity here. You said that "sources MUST be from crates.io", but this is NOT in the the text of the guidelines. I always understood the PG rule for naming with rust-* as intended to prevent confusion and or/conflict if a different package with a given name was later uploaded to crates.io. Once the code stabilizes, I expect normal releases to be made and uploaded to crates.io. I didn't do this here, because it seemed silly to tag new versions when the package is under development and I'll want to build a new version in rawhide possibly every few days and there are no other uses of the crate. That said, I would be fine with renaming the package to 'add-determinism' if there's a strong reason to do that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2271204 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202271204%23c10 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
