https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144589 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx --- Comment #37 from David Woodhouse <dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Grant Williamson from comment #0) > Makes the TPM 2.0 accessible via the standard OpenSSL API and command-line > tools, so one can add TPM support to (almost) any OpenSSL 3.0 based > application. So if I use (almost) any existing OpenSSL based application in Fedora, and in place of a "normal" key file I just happen to pass it a PEM file starting ----- BEGIN TSS2 PRIVATE KEY----- according to the specification at https://www.hansenpartnership.com/draft-bottomley-tpm2-keys.html I should expect that to work, right? Nothing *extra* to do for any normal application? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2144589 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202144589%23c37 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
