Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-camlp5 - Classical version of camlp4 OCaml preprocessor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253570 ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-01-20 16:23 EST ------- So which package should be reviewed here? This is Richard's ticket; Richard, did you want to update to a more recent version? Unfortunately I can't get to annexia.org to grab any of your packages. While I'm at it, I don't know what to make of these; the current ocaml guidelines don't mention .opt files: ocaml-camlp5-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/camlp5o.opt ocaml-camlp5-devel.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/camlp5r.opt The only other package I can see in the distro that includes .opt files is the ocaml-camlp4-devel package, and rpmlint doesn't seem to complain about them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review