https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269042 Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(ngompa13@xxxxxxxx | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Dalton Miner from comment #2) > Notes: > * libfetch is vendored into the source tree. Should this be packaged and > depended on, or is this not the kind of bundling that's a problem? If it was not modified for apk-tools' usage, it could have been. I will talk to upstream about what their plans are for apk3. > * apk-tools does run, but fails on most operations without a database. > Expected? Yes, this is expected. apt+dpkg and pacman similarly fail. > * Technically upstream does provide tests, but only a very basic smoke test. > Could be included in %check if possible. I've added a check section to run the tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2269042 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202269042%23c3 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
