https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209858 --- Comment #26 from Artur Frenszek-Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > Not completely sure about the licensing though, but we are completely > removing third_party/ so I guess we could just put GPL-2.0-only in the > license field? Personally I'd argue that, since these are header-only libraries that are, effectively, statically-linked into the executable, it does not matter whether we're using the bundled versions from the third_party/ directory, or the ones provided by Fedora packages - their licences should still be included in the tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2209858 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-spam&short_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202209858%23c26 -- _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
